Showing posts with label National Council for Adoption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Council for Adoption. Show all posts

Sunday, March 9, 2008

UNITED STATES: Movies Open Door for Adoption Advocates

Not directly related to adoptee rights, but important.

USA TODAY
March 9, 2008


Movies open door for adoption advocates
By Wendy Koch, USA TODAY

The popularity of Juno and Bella, movies about young, unmarried, pregnant women, has given the National Council for Adoption an opening.

The private advocacy group is launching a public service advertising campaign thisweek that includes radio and TV spots as well as billboards, all with this tagline: "Sometimes choosing adoption is being a good mother."

"We see (the movies) as an opportunity to promote adoption awareness," says the group's president, Thomas Atwood. He says the award-winning films, both of them about women who consider adoption for their babies, have given the issue visibility.

The ads are part of a larger government and private effort to reverse the decrease in the number of single women who place infants for adoption.

Fewer than 1% of unmarried pregnant women relinquished their infants for adoption in 2002, the most recent year for which data are available, says Paul Placek, a consultant to the council. That compares with 8.7% before 1973, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Placek says more women have kept their babies as the stigma of single motherhood has eased. Some of them have abortions, although the abortion rate has declined, too.

In 2000, Congress approved a program to promote infant adoption. The Department of Health and Human Services awards grants to organizations, including the adoption council, to train pregnancy counselors at federally funded clinics to present adoption as an option. The grants also have paid for public service ads.

Private groups, including the Minnesota-based Adoption Option Committee, have formed to try to support birth mothers, in part with college scholarships.

NARAL, a group that advocates for abortion rights, "fully supports providing information about options, including adoption," to pregnant women, spokesman Ted Miller says.

Atwood says his group's ads "are not trying to persuade anyone or twist anyone's arms. We're trying to get them to consider adoption. Infant adoption is ripe for growth, for revival."

"Some women are parenting who aren't ready to parent," Atwood says. He adds that single parenthood is difficult, and many children are placed in foster care because of abuse or neglect.

Julia Thornton, 33, a political appointee at the White House, says she was a freshman in college when she became pregnant. She found herself to be the only pregnant woman on campus. Raised Catholic, she chose to relinquish her baby girl but says she has stayed in close touch with the girl and her adoptive mother.

Janelle Kreeb, 30, placed a boy for adoption 11 years ago. "I was young and wanted to go to college," says Kreeb, of Arlington, Va.

She was adopted herself and says her adoptive parents encouraged her to consider adoption. Now studying for a master's degree, she says she knows she did the right thing. She says her son is happy and is doing well in sports and school. "I'm very proud of him."

Link to article

Thursday, March 6, 2008

MICHIGAN: Bill Would Extend Adoptee Rights, March 6, 2008

Take the Survey
Comments


DETROIT NEWS
March 6, 2008

Bill Would Extend Adoptee Rights
Kim Kozlowsky

A Michigan House committee on Wednesday approved a bill that would allow some adults adopted as children to get their original birth certificate.

"It's a great first step in getting adoptees the rights we've been entitled to all along," Daryl Royal, a moderator of the Internet mailing list michigansearching.com, said after the hearing of the Family and Children's Services Committee.

Michigan law currently allows birth certificate access to adoptees after they become adults. But those who were adopted between May 1945 and Sept 12, 1980, cannot get their original birth certificate, a situation that has left thousands of people without any clues to their family origin, genealogy or medical history.

Instead, they have a birth certificate that lists only their adopted parents.

The proposed bill also would give parents who gave their children up for adoption during those years the option of letting the state know if they're willing to be contacted. If they prefer no contact, they would be asked to fill out an updated health history.

At the hearing, several advocates lobbied lawmakers to pass the bill, pointing to states that have opened adoption records and saying they deserve to enjoy the rights that many Michigan residents take for granted.

"Closed-record adoptees have been swept under the rug for far too long," Center Line resident Dee Lindeman told the committee. "It is time to right this wrong and bring us some manner of parity with other adoptees across Michigan."

Opponents of the legislation include Bethany Christian Services, an adoption agency; Right to Life of Michigan; and the National Council for Adoption.

Though representatives from those organizations did not testify Wednesday, some lawmakers voiced concerns about disregarding a birth parent's wish not to be contacted.

"I don't want those people who don't want to be revealed to be revealed," said Rep. Fulton Sheen, R-Plainwell, who opposed the measure along with fellow Republican Reps. Brian Palmer of Romeo and Jack Hoogendyk of Texas Township.

Rep. Lisa Wojno, D-Warren, countered that Oregon passed a similar law 10 years ago and since then, 83 people have indicated they do not want to be contacted. Supporters also noted that research by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute showed that states with open adoption records have not seen an increase in abortions or decrease in adoptions.

An identical bill has been introduced in the Senate, but has not yet been scheduled for a hearing.

You can reach Kim Kozlowski at or kkozlowski@detnews.com

Link to article

Sunday, March 2, 2008

NORTH CAROLINA: Biological Connections, March 2, 2008

HICKORY DAILY RECORD
March 2, 2008


Biological Connection
by Jennifer Menster

CONOVER -- Toni Jones and Ryan Peedin don’t share the same last name. They can’t reflect on childhood memories of Ryan making As, playing sports or getting married.

But Toni and Ryan have the same eyes. Their laughs twine together, and a current photo of Ryan resembles a younger version of Toni’s brother, Bob.

The two are biologically connected: Toni was 15 when she got pregnant in the 1970s. Her parents made her give up the child. Ryan, a name later given to him, went to a wonderful set of parents in Johnston County. He grew up knowing he was adopted.

“I was always curious, and I would think about it long enough to feed my curiosity,” Peedin says. “I knew adoption records were sealed, and I didn’t have a lot of encouragement legal-wise.”

Peedin grew up, got married and has two daughters who favored him. He couldn’t help but wonder where his daughters’ eye color or facial features really came from. As he aged and his daughters grew, Peedin questioned if he should be worried about diabetes or high blood pressure or other medical concerns that might run in his biological parents’ families.


The search begins

In June 2004, Peedin began his search. He was 32 years old. The agency Peedin worked with in Johnston County, where he lives, couldn’t give him identifying records. A copy of his birth certificate was false: It listed his adopted parents as his birth parents. Peedin tried three or four registry Web sites where adoptees and birth parents sometimes go to the find one another. Matches are rare.

His adoptive parents were open in helping Peedin with the search. Mom and Dad told Peedin everything they could. Peedin knew he was born in 1972 (birth days never change) in Catawba County, and he knew his biological mother was around 15 when he was born.

Copies of non-identifying information gave him several clues. His birth parents’ names were blacked out, but on one sheet, Peedin could make out a T. Another clue was that the birth mother’s father was born in Ohio and her mother was born in Catawba County.

Peedin took the clues - a T, her age, Ohio and Catawba County - and went to the Catawba County Register of Deeds Office to search birth records. It took him 15 minutes before he found Toni’s birth certificate.

“There was no doubt in my mind that we had found her,” Peedin said.

However, it would still be a while before Peedin confirmed she was the one. He figured she was married and had a new last name. He didn’t know if she was living out of state or maybe even dead. Peedin went to Sybil Good at Family Builders, a division of the Department of Social Services that handles adoptions and foster home licensing.

What a small world: Good was the same social worker who helped place Ryan more than 30 years ago. She knew his birth mother, but by law couldn’t tell him. Instead, she offered him what services and advice she legally could.

Disappointment, then success

A frustrated Peedin was a little disappointed and uncertain about what to do, but he didn’t give up. His wife called a private investigator. The P.I. refused to take the case because Peedin had come so far by himself. The investigator gave Peedin a tip.

Peedin had looked up Toni’s parents’ telephone number in the phone book, but he was uncertain whether to call them, not knowing if they’d be willing to help. With a little white lie and the P.I.’s advice, Peedin had a female call Toni’s mom asking for her contact information for a class reunion. Peedin had his birth mother’s married name, her address and telephone number.

What now?

He called Good for advice, and she told him to write a letter. A letter? Peedin didn’t know what to say. He had been so focused during his two-month search, but the emotions were beginning to swell. He wanted to be fair - to himself and Toni. What if she didn’t want to have anything to do with him? In the letter, he said that would be her decision. He told her good parents raised him and he understood the circumstances of his adoption. Peedin didn’t want to get his expectations too high and a lot of the letter was curiosity about medical history.

Peedin sent the letter to Good, who served as a go-between. Toni said when she heard the phone message from Good she knew exactly what it was about.

“Whenever she said, ‘This is Sybil Good,’ I could have fell to the floor,” Jones said. “I was never expecting this to happen. I gave up on that a long time ago.”

On Sept. 12, 2004, Peedin met his birth mother. He, his wife, Joy, and Toni and her husband, Keith, met at Valley Hills Mall for dinner. They wound up returning to the Jones’ home and talking for hours.

Peedin and Jones talk at least once a week. They’ve vacationed together and visit several times a year. Jones has met Peedin’s adopted mother and several other family members. It’s still not time for Peedin to meet his biological father or grandparents.

A new law

Peedin spent more than two months searching for his birth mother. It was worth it, but it would have been nice if he could have skipped the work and gone straight to an agency to get his answers.

Now, adoptees, their lineal descendants if the adoptee is deceased and biological parents can do just that. A law that went into effect Jan. 1 allows North Carolina counties the option to serve as confidential intermediaries between adult adoptees and biological parents.

In December, the Catawba County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a Confidential Intermediary Program in the county. Family Builders heads up the program.

“We’ve been ready to serve since (the beginning),” Sybil Good said. “Now we can actually search for a person, and we have avenues to search databases this agency has access to.”

These are the standard services of the Confidential Intermediary Program offered by Family Builders:

• Provides initial consultation regarding the county’s policy in addressing House Bill 445;
• Conducts an in-house record review and a search for the person listed above, including, but not limited to, an Internet based search;
• Initiates contact with any person found in an attempt to obtain current non-identifying health and background information;
• Ascertains that person’s willingness to share identifying information or have contact with the applicant; and/or
• Provides the intermediary services needed to ensure all parties are addressing the psychological and social issues in a healthy and productive manner.

Additional services would include facilitating contact if both parties agree and continue to provide services regarding psychological and social issues. There is a fee for the services.

The program has backing from the county and state, but across the country the issue of opening birth records of adoptees has raised concerns. Opposition has come from the National Council for Adoption, some Catholic bishops, abortion opponents and civil libertarians, according to a recent article in USA Today. Opponents believe open records violate a birth mother’s right to privacy and some women may choose abortion over adoption.

But in Catawba County, everyone is allowed choices, and it’s up to the biological children and parents if they want to meet.

Peedin is grateful Jones was willing to meet with him. It not only gives him a chance to learn about his past, but it gives them a chance for a future.

jmenster@hickoryrecord.com | x5409 or

Link to article

Friday, February 29, 2008

UNITED STATES:/MAINE: Adopted Main Senator Finds Birth Parents, February 29, 2008


Also links to poll and high-traffic forum on adoptee rights.

ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHT

February 29, 2008

Adopted Maine Senator Finds Birth Parents: Sen. Paula Benoit Says Unsealing Her Birth Records Changed her Life

By Gigi Stone

Paula Benoit lives a full life, balancing motherhood with a career as a state senator in Maine. Yet ever since she can remember, there was something gnawing inside her, something she wanted to know.

"I really had always wondered about my identity, who I looked like, my medical history," Benoit said.

Benoit was adopted as an infant. At age 52, she decided it was finally time to find out the identity of her natural parents. She went to court to obtain her birth certificate.

Her request was denied. In Maine, as in most states, adoption records are sealed.

Do you think adult adoptees should be able to obtain their birth records? VOTE HERE.

Are you an adoptee considering reaching out to a birth parent? Is your family considering adoption? Click here for adoption-related Web resources.

"I want that piece of paper," said Benoit. "What right does that judge have to sit there with my records?"

So she began working on legislation to unseal records for all adoptees in her home state. When the state legislature passed this bill last year, Maine became the eighth state to give adoptees full access to their birth records, including their parents' names.

Other states that have unsealed birth certificates include Alabama, Delaware, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Massachusetts. Kansas and Alaska were never sealed them. Right now, bills are pending to unseal adoption records in New York, New Jersey, Ohio and Minnesota.

But the bills are facing some strong opposition.

Members of some Catholic groups worry that passage of these bills might lead more women to have abortions. Groups like the National Council for Adoption, which argues for the rights of mothers who gave up their babies, said that if birth mothers or adopted children really want to find each other, they can list their names in registries set up by states.

There are no laws that promise birth mothers anonymity, but many women who gave up their children for adoption did so after agencies reassured them and social workers that the records would remain sealed.

"Marie," who refused to be identified, put her baby up for adoption nearly 20 years ago. She fears that if her husband and children find out about her secret all these years later, it will tear her family apart.

"To just rip open people's lives when you really don't know what their experiences have been that have caused that decision in the first place is something to me that is, I mean it's almost cruel," said "Marie."

But Paula Benoit believes it was cruel to keep her identity a secret. And she finally learned the names of her birth parents. She also discovered something else she never could have imagined. Two of her colleagues in the Maine legislature, State Sen. Bruce Bryant and State Rep. Mark Bryant, are her nephews.

"I just sat in the chair and thought, 'Oh, my gosh,'" said Benoit.

"The major shock is that she's serving in the Senate," said Bryant. "I'm serving in the Senate, and we're in the same building."

Paula Benoit said unsealing her birth records has changed her life. She wants that experience for all adoptees. Despite the promises made to mothers made in the past, she believes today that people like her have the right to know.


Link to article

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/story?id=&page=1

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

NORTH CAROLINA: IT'S THE LAW - AS OF TODAY, JANUARY 1, 2008

FAYETTE OBSERVER,
January 1, 2008

It's the Law - As of Today
By John Ramsey
Staff writer

Starting today, bars and restaurants will have to recycle all those empty beer and wine bottles left from New Year’s bashes. Life insurance salesmen will find their jobs tougher on Army grounds. Smokers in state buildings will have to find an outdoors spot to indulge their habit. These are among the new state laws that took effect on the first day of the yeartake effect today.

Keep your butt outside

  • Smoking is prohibited in buildings owned or leased by the state. The ban also extends to state psychiatric facilities.
Who’s your daddy?
  • Adopted children will have an easier time finding information about their biological parents with this law change. County Social Services departments and adoption agencies act as third parties to help find family health information, and adopted adults can use the agencies to find their birth parents as long as all parties give written consent. Nicole Callahan with the National Council for Adoption said the change is better than a mandatory openness law but worse than a mutual consent registry.

Taming Loan Sharks

  • In response to the national subprime mortgage crisis, the state is making it tougher for lenders to issue loans that consumers likely can’t pay back. The law forces lenders to do more work to ensure that customers can afford loans and will prohibit prepayment penalties, which keep people from refinancing a bad loan. The bill also gives consumers more rights when working with mortgage brokers. “It’s definitely a step forward,” said Al Ripley, counsel for consumer and housing affairs at the N.C. Justice Center. “It will help protect home buyers or people refinancing their mortgages from subprime predatory loans.”

Don’t come knocking

  • The activity of life insurance salesmen will be regulated on Army bases. Door-to-door solicitation will be prohibited, as will making appointments at barracks. “The bottom line is, we just don’t think they should be taken advantage of,” said state Rep. Marvin Lucas, one of the law’s primary sponsors. “We think that the commanders are well in charge and know fully what these guys may need ... not somebody coming door-to-door.”

Bob Barker would be proud

  • A new law requires 20 cents of every rabies tag sold to go to spay and neuter programs for pets.

Protect your neck

  • All motorcycle riders will be required to wear safety-approved helmets attached with a strap, a law that doesn’t sit well with many bikers. John McKenzie, a salesman at Sandhills Cycle Center in Pinehurst, said more than half of his customers have complained about the new rule. “A lot of them think it should be a matter of choice,” he said. “To me it restricts your vision and your hearing some too. ... I’m just as comfortable riding without a helmet.” Bikers around the state have planned rides today ito protest the law.

Green bars

  • The New Year’s partyers won’t be the only people waking up to a headache this morning. Bars and restaurants will be required to recycle glass, a law that many bar managers understand in theory but dislike in practice. Smaller bars will have to make room for extra trash cans, and trash cans will all be located behind the bar to keep staff from having to dig through the trash the next day. “I think it’s a good thing, but at the same time, trying to get everything organized, it’s a little bit hectic,” said Dana Donner, manager at The Pour House. “It’s kind of a pain in the butt.”

Residency question

  • People arrested for a felony or driving under the influence in North Carolina after today will be asked if they are legal U.S. residents. Latino and civil liberties groups have said the law encourages racial profiling.

Gold Star Plates

  • The state will make it easier to get Gold Star license plates by eliminating a rule that required 300 applications and by waiving the fee for them. Gold Stars are issued to family members of military men and women killed in the line of duty.

Check yes or no

  • Anyone planning to run for office in North Carolina will have to answer a question common on job applications: “Have you ever been convicted of a felony?”

Link to article

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

UNITED STATES: States urged to Let Adoptees See Records

CBS News,
November 12, 2007


States Urged To Let Adoptees See Records

NEW YORK, Nov. 12, 2007 (CBS/AP) It is among the most divisive questions in the realm of adoption: Should adult adoptees have access to their birth records, and thus be able to learn the identity of their birth parents?

In a comprehensive report being released Monday, a leading U.S. adoption institute says the answer is "Yes" and urges the rest of America to follow the path of the eight states that allow such access to all adults who were adopted.

"States' experiences in providing this information make clear that there are minimal, if any, negative repercussions," said the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. "Outcomes appear to have been overwhelmingly positive for adult adopted persons and birthparents alike."

For years there has been an assumption privacy was in the best interests of the birth parents who give up their children and the families who adopt them, reports CBS News correspondent Cynthia Bowers.

Today's report suggests otherwise. It found when states open records:

# The number of adoptions did not drop.
# Abortions did not rise.
# There were no unwanted intrusions.
# Ninety-five percent of birth parents said they were open to contact by their children.

Opponents of open access argue that unsealing birth records violates the privacy that birthmothers expected when they opted to give up their babies. They raise the specter of birthparents forced into unwanted relationships with grown children who have tracked them down.

But the Donaldson Institute says most birthparents, rather than being fearful and ashamed, welcome contact with the children they bore.

Kansas and Alaska never barred adoptees from seeing their birth certificates. Since 1996, six other states - Alabama, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, Oregon and Tennessee - have decided to allow access to all adult adoptees.

However, the progression has been slow, and open-records legislation has been rebuffed in many states by a determined and diverse opposition.

Opponents in Connecticut, where bills have failed in each of the past two years, included the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. It depicted itself as a voice for birthmothers who opposed the measure but were reluctant to speak out publicly.

In New Jersey, where a long-running campaign to pass an open-re+cords bill was derailed again this year, the opposition includes New Jersey Right to Life and the New Jersey Catholic Conference. They argue that eliminating the prospect of confidentiality might prompt a pregnant single woman to choose abortion rather than adoption.

Marlene Lao-Collins of the Catholic Conference said she knew of no data supporting the concerns about abortions, "but even if it just happened once, that would be one too many."

Nationwide, one of the major foes of open records is the National Council for Adoption, which represents many religiously affiliated adoption agencies. Its president, Thomas Atwood, says any reconnection between an adopted adult and a birthparent should be by mutual consent - which is the policy in most states.

"I empathize with anybody who feels the need to know their biological parents' identity," Atwood said. "But I don't think the law should enable them to force themselves on someone who has personal reasons for wanting confidentiality."

The Donaldson report says evidence from the states with open records rebuts every argument against the concept. Notably, it says there is no proof that abortions rise, that adoptions decline, or that birthparents are harassed following a switch to open records.

"There has been no evidence that the lives of birthmothers have been damaged as a result," the report says. "In the states that have amended their laws ... few birthmothers have expressed the desire to keep records sealed or the wish not to be contacted."

The most recent state to opt for open records is Maine; a law signed in June will allow adult adoptees to access their birth certificates starting in 2009.

One of the bill's main sponsors was state Sen. Paula Benoit, an adoptee who personally lobbied all her colleagues. While working on the bill, she uncovered her own biological background and learned, to her amazement, that two Democratic lawmakers she was working with were her nephews.

"There are so many adoptees who want to know who they are," she said. "Can you imagine being denied your identity?"Among the many birthmothers grateful to have been found by children they relinquished is Eileen McQuade of Delray Beach, Florida, who is president of the American Adoption Congress and a fervent advocate of open records.

"Secrecy was the way it was done at the time - it was not a choice or a preference on the part of the mothers," McQuade said of the 1960s, when she placed a daughter for adoption. "We treat adoptees as if they're forever children - it's absurd."

The Donaldson report depicts adopted people as the only class of Americans not permitted to routinely obtain their birth certificates.

Giving them full access "is a matter of legal equality, ethical practice and, on a human level, basic fairness," the report said. "It is an essential step toward placing adoptive families, families of origin, everyone connected to them and, indeed, adoption itself on a level playing field within society, without the stigma, shame and inequitable treatment they have experienced in the past."

"The mythology around adoption is based on the notion that you should be protecting someone from something," said the institute's executive director, Adam Pertman.

"But that's not the reality," he said. "Adoptees are not behaving poorly, they're behaving very respectfully, and birthparents do not appear to be a frightened class that wants to hide."


Link to article
Also see video at link