Showing posts with label false deaths. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false deaths. Show all posts

Monday, January 28, 2008

CANADA: Adoptees Claim They Lost Their Biological Parents Through Underhanded Methods, January 28, 2008


VANCOUVER SUN,
January 27, 2008


Adoptees claim they lost their biological parents through underhanded methods

by Duncan Thorne, Canwest News Service


EDMONTON -- An adopted woman's claim that her birth mother was tricked into surrendering her has prompted other adoptees to say they too lost their biological parents through underhanded methods.

In recent days, Canwest News Service has heard from adoptees across Canada who have read about the case of an Alberta woman who alleges in a lawsuit that her birth mother was told she had died at or soon after birth.

The lawsuit, which remains unproven, has become a lightning rod on Internet websites for adoptees and their biological parents. That's partly because the daughter is suing not only the Alberta government, a hospital and doctors but even her adoptive mother.

The adoptive mother says she had no role the decision to put the daughter up for adoption.

The daughter, born in the 1960s, has won a temporary publication ban against being identified.

"I'm supposed to be stillborn, too," says Sheri Sexton in an interview from Ottawa.

Sexton was born in 1968, near the end of what some adoptees now call a "baby-scoop era" when there was immense pressure to put young, single mothers' babies up for adoption.

After the Second World War, society became increasingly sexually liberated but until the 1970s birth outside marriage was taboo and abortion was illegal.

Sexton, put up for adoption immediately after birth in Ottawa, managed to find her birth mother, Darlene Hogan, 14 years ago.

Hogan was 19 when she gave birth to Sexton. She said she was forced to sign papers, while heavily sedated, allowing Sexton to be put up for adoption.

"I was kept in a room all day," Hogan says. "I did nothing but cry. I kept telling the man that I did not want to sign the papers."

A year later, in 1969, she gave birth to a second daughter. She was told the baby was stillborn.

Sexton and Hogan are puzzled that Sexton had been told her birthday was July 16, two days before the real date. Later, Sexton discovered problems with her birth records. A search of hospital files found her listed as "stillborn," the same as her younger sister.

Hogan is now convinced her second daughter lived.

A report on violence against women from the United Nations Economic and Social Council, refers to the case of an unmarried woman who gave birth at Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital in 1970. The 2003 report says Tina Kelly was reportedly told by her doctor that the baby boy had died and that she was not allowed to see its body.

Kelly later realized she had never received a copy of the death certificate, the report says. The hospital's records indicated her baby went home with her.

She later reunited with her son.

Kelly allegedly discovered her child had been put up for adoption and that her doctor had accepted a bribe.

Elva Anderson was 19 in 1964 when she gave birth to twin boys in Mississauga, Ont.

She says her doctor told her the boys had died after birth. Once home, she got a call from the hospital that her twins were waiting to be collected.

Anderson says her former partner persuaded her the twins were dead. She now thinks she was duped and that her twins were put up for adoption.

Such allegations are hard to prove, says Michelle Edmunds who runs a website - theadoptionshow.com.

"The thing is that these women were never given a death certificate because there wasn't one," Edmunds said from Toronto. She said it's their word "against an entire system" that doctors told them their children had died.

Edmunds was herself put into foster care in 1964, then 19 months old, because her mother was considered unsuitable. She eventually found her mother, Elsie White, in Edmonton in 1996, a year before White died.

Bryony Lake of Victoria gave up her son to adoption after his birth in 1980. Lake wasn't misled into thinking he had died but, as a single mother, was pressured by her parents to surrender her baby.

In the course of searching for her son, she often heard stories of mothers being falsely told their babies had died.

"It's hard to say any of these are substantiated, other than perhaps Tina Kelly's," Lake acknowledged.

Still, it makes sense some mothers were told their babies had died, given attitudes of the 1960s and earlier, she said. "They may have thought it's the humane thing to do, for the mother, to tell her the baby died, if they figured the mother would not be able to keep the baby.

"They figured that would be less traumatic to a mother than letting her see and nurse her baby. What they didn't realize was it then took away her decision-making ability."

Lisa Pageau speaks for Mouvement Retrouvailles, a Quebec group which helps adoptees and biological parents reunite. She believes false claims of stillbirths were common in her province.

"In those days , they would put mothers to sleep to have their baby and when their mothers were groggy coming out of it, they would show them a very sick baby, a dead baby actually, and say, 'Your baby's dead,' " she says.

"And it wasn't true."

The woman with the lawsuit in Alberta has persuaded city police to investigate her claim of fraudulent adoption.

Police are conducting interviews and reviewing documents.

Mary Lou Reeleder, a Children's Services spokeswoman, said the department sometimes hears anecdotal stories of wrongful adoption but "nothing like that has come to their attention that was any more than, 'I have heard this.' "

Just as now, in the 1960s the courts screened adoptions and had to be satisfied that biological parents consented, Reeleder says.

Marge, an Edmonton adoptee who has long searched for her birth parents, said she fears the lawsuit will discourage the government from increasing access to adoption records.

Link to article

Sunday, January 27, 2008

CANADA: Too Many Cases to Ignore Despite Lack of Proof, January 27, 2008

EDMONTON JOURNAL
January 27,2008



Too many cases to ignore despite lack of proof
Anecdotal evidence gives ample cause for concern


The mountain of stories about birth mothers being tricked or coerced into adopting out their babies makes it clear there were abuses for decades, says a leading adoption researcher.

Adoptees and biological mothers from across Canada have told of their problems since The Journal reported this month on an Alberta woman who alleges she was falsely told her daughter had died at birth in the 1960s.

Most stories lack documentary proof, but researcher Michael Grand, a University of Guelph psychologist specializing on adoptions, says there are too many cases to ignore.

Grand, while not speaking of the Alberta allegation which is part of a lawsuit, says young, single mothers generally had no one to defend them.

The pressures to adopt out were immense in past decades, when single motherhood was taboo, he said in an interview from Guelph, Ont. The situation in Alberta was no different.

It's only in the past 25 years that abuses dropped off sharply, with changing attitudes, Grand said. Even in the past, there were biological mothers who were treated fairly and professionally.

"But I have to tell you that the stories just keep coming." He counts them in the hundreds.

Typically, victims were young, unmarried, from lower-middle or working class roots, with little chance of earning a living while raising a child, he said. Doctors and social workers once considered it best for the baby to be adopted.

"There are other cases that I've heard over the years of women who have been told that their babies have died. Or in the state of postpartum, where they've just given birth and under the effect of raging hormones, are told to sign (adoption) papers," he says.

"It's a process in which there was very little independent legal counsel or independent personal counselling of the young woman to look at the kinds of options that were available to her." A social worker may have worked with the birth mother, but they also would have worked with the people wanting to adopt the baby, Grand said.

"So many birth mothers have reported to me that they were not allowed to see the child," likely to prevent bonding.

"I wonder how many of those young women, if they had been able to see and hold their child, might have found the courage and means, in spite of the abandonment by everyone, to raise that child," he said.

"Everything was set up against them. The counselling beforehand, the actions that took place in the birthing room, the actions that take place right after in the hospital, and then eventually just being pushed out onto the street." An unmarried mother was seen as morally loose, he said.

"So no one ever seemed to be concerned about her best interest. The feeling was, the sooner the child was taken away from her, to a good middle-class white home, the better the child would be."


Link to article