Wednesday, January 2, 2008

MISSOURI: Foster Mom Creates a Permanent Home for Siblings, January 2, 2008

CORRECTED VERSION (see comments)

HAYES DAILY EXAMINER/
AP MISSOURI PANORAMA
January 2, 2008

Foster mom creates a permanent home for siblings

By HUGH S. WELSH

INDEPENDENCE, Mo. (AP) -- For resident Helen Martin, the last six years have been enlightening, emboldening, disheartening and, finally, celebratory.

She has seen her kids flung from squalor to luxury and back to squalor again.

And then she saw her kids find permanent luxury -- a luxury that includes their own beds, rooms, PlayStations and, most importantly, their own identity.

"I love my babies," Martin said. "They're my family, and we're good."

Several months ago, Martin was granted a verdict that terminated the parental rights of the birth mother of her three foster children, granting Martin permission to formally adopt them.

In late September, Martin held a party to commemorate the occasion. In attendance were 75 people, including family members, teachers and the attorneys and judge who followed their case from Day One.

"It was the most wonderful party I've ever been a part of," Martin said.

The children she once fostered now carry her last name and all have new Social Security numbers.

"I'd like to think they've been reborn," Martin said.

Psychologically, Martin is battered and bruised -- but upright.

And the same could be said for her newfound kids who have, since birth, suffered an untold number of hardships both physical and psychological.

Two of her children may always have learning disabilities.

But at least they're clean, attending school and making friends.

The story of the making of a family began with the arrival of a caseworker's car holding three children of different ages.

"I'd always wanted to be a foster mom," Martin said. "Now, here was my chance."

In the back seat of the car was Ann, a 2-year-old girl in a diaper and incapable of speaking.

Next to her was Michael, a 7-year-old boy with a junkyard dog temperament and four-letter vocabulary.

And in the front seat was Sara, an 11-year-old girl with hardly a kindergarten education.

All wearing clothing dirtied and ragged. All victims of abuse, molestation and neglect.

For two years, Martin gave them a home -- a home they could call their own.

That is until the death of their father, who was the parent found to be at fault for their despair by the courts.

With his passing, the birth mother's custody was restored and the kids were returned to their origins.

It would not last.

She loves running her fingers through Sara's flowing brunette hair.

"I remember how heartbreaking it was to see it chopped off," Martin said.

Four months passed before Martin saw the children after returning them to the birth mother.

Again, they arrived in tatters in a caseworker's automobile.

This time, however, two of their heads were bare, shaven to combat a bout with head lice.

Sara's face was pockmarked with acne.

The court had spoken -- and so had Martin.

"These children needed a proper home; they deserved it," Martin said. "I vowed then and there to become their adoptive mother."

The normal process to terminate parental rights takes two years.

This was not true in the instance of Martin and her foster children.

Martin's quest would force her to slog through a four-year quagmire of court dates, counseling sessions and a court requirement that her foster children see their biological mother every week; the visits would typically be canceled by the birth mother at the last minute.

"It was like the mother saw her own kids as a court-borne burden or something," Martin said.

While the process dragged, Sara began to fear about her adoption eligibility.

"She was 16 and scared she might be reaching the end of the rope," Martin said. "She was scared she might have to make it on her own."

Contrary to popular belief, there is no age limitation on adoption eligibility, according to the North American Council on Adoptable Children.

Not that it mattered.

"If she was handed back over to her mother, she told me she would rather live on her own," Martin said.

Four months ago, the decision was made.

And it was a favorable one for Martin and family.

Martin was made the legal adoptive mother of her three foster children.

Now -- and forever more -- they're well-fed, well-treated and well-educated.

Pictures abound on the walls of Martin's home, including a recent family portrait that discernibly showcases a now 13-year-old boy who is soft-spoken and mindful to use "ma'am" and "sir" when spoken to.

"At this point, I might as well have given birth to them," Martin said. "I love them so much."

Although Helen Martin feels her children have every right to seek out their biological family when they turn 18 years of age, she is opposed to an open records policy for adoptees in Missouri.

"I just don't feel it's necessary," Martin said.

Her opinion is not as mindful of the privacy of the birth mother as it is the identity of the child.

According to Martin, bestowing upon the adoptee the original birth certificate and adoption record poses a crisis of identity.

"When a child is adopted they become a part of the adoptive family," Martin said. "In other words, that's who they are."

Martin said her eldest adopted daughter resembles her birth mother in every sense, yet, to her daughter, she is not her mom.

"She's just the person who brought her into this world, not the one who intends to love and care for her for the rest of her life," Martin said.

It's the adoptive parent who can take that credit.

Link to Article

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

OMG Marley! - you certainly did highlight the most important part for open records supporters.

Identity crisis indeed! I can understand these kids not wanting to be in contact with their bparents - but their IDENTITY is theirs and theirs alone.

The identity crisis is NOT about having a different life, even a bad one, before you were "saved". It's about having that "previous identity" erased. There's your Identity Crisis. I suppose compared to their b-parents, this adopter is an angel.

And I don't get the "they have every right to seek out their biological families" but open records aren't necessary?

BTW - the author of this article assured me that he would be writing about the Donaldson report - I'm still waiting.

Marley Greiner said...

I found the article rather strange. Kansas has never sealed records. These kids are older out of foster care and know where they came from. This foster mother doesn't seem to well informed.

Gershom Kaligawa said...

doesn't seem to be informed at all, what the hell? identity crisis.... she doesn't get it.

Marley Greiner said...

After looking at this article again I see that although the article was published in a Kansas newspaper, it is about a Missouri situation. I have corrected this. That still doesn't change the ignorant quote from the "new mom."

Anonymous said...

Helen Martin is an idiot on so many levels it is hard to know where to begin. First of all, her story of adopting a family of abused kids has zero to do with the issue of open records, and it is hard to see how being able to get their OBC would constitute an identity crisis for these older kids, since they already know their original identity! Who thought her ignorant views on this subject were even relevant?

I think the caseworker who placed these kids should be fired, as the
ignorance and arrogance of Ms. Martin hardly makes her an ideal adoptive parent for special needs children. Playstations and separate bedrooms or not (and doesn't she know the really hot game system is the Wii? Normal middle-class life is hardly "luxury" either:-) I still feel sorry for those kids who have already suffered so much.

SHE feels like they have been reborn and she gave birth?? Would that mean all problems stemming from years of abuse have vanished as if by magic? Somehow I think not. And while she may be justified in having no respect for the birthparents who abused those kids, someone should clue her in that her hateful attitude towards the biological family is going to impact on the
children. If she keeps telling them they came from trash and are so lucky she rescued them , how are they going to feel about themselves, no matter how much she says she loves them?

This is all very elemental common sense psych 101 stuff that the agency workers should have gone over BEFORE allowing her to adopt, and disqualified her because of her attitudes. It sounds like another one of those "ANYONE who will take these garbage patch kids can have them, and we won't look too closely for qualifications to adopt."

Anonymous said...

I don't see how adoption of older children who already know their identity has anything to do with those adoptees who have been prevented from finding their identity.

I am in agreement with Maryanne that these children will probably take on the hostile attitude of their adoptive 'savior' mother which may prevent them, or at least hinder their healing process.

No matter what kinds of abuse these children have experienced with their birth family, they have to forgive them. The alternative is to continue to hate and then be consumed by it.

I hope their 'abuse' wasn't that they didn't have their own bedroom and a play station. Don't mean to sound flippant but many years ago I was living in Caliornia and had a good friend who was a working single mom.

Her daughter was a spoiled brat. My friend worked at a low-paying job and one time, when her mom couldn't buy her something she went to the school counselor and told them there was no food in the house and her mother drank.

I knew this lady and many of us, at times, are low on food, but this child was far from starving.

In any case, before you knew it, they took the girl and put her in an a foster home (this girl was having a great time) and my friend found out at the end of the day what happened.

The end result was that N's daughter stayed in this foster system for about a a year and my friend had to go once-a-week to take this pill. If she drank even wine with dinner it would make her sick.

N's daughter had a great time in the foster home and my friend was the one who suffered.

This is not to minimize what may have happened to the children in the article because there is much abuse (my adoptive father was extremely abusive), but I am just saying that sometimes the facts may become distorted and then it could take a lifetime to correct the mistakes.

Anonymous said...

Helen Martin is someone who would see all adoptees in her state denied their OBCs so that she can keep pretending these "babies" were reborn to her now that their mother was effectively terminated from their lives. How caring of her.

I'd bet their mother was a long-term victim of abuse herself and any intervention she may have received, if any, was too little too late. The article pointed out that the perpetrator of the abuse that the children were originally taken into foster care for, was the father, not the mother, but Helen the saviour will be sure to make the mother out as bad a villain to kill off any remnants of her that may be left in their hearts. All their love and loyalty must go only to her, only to Helen.